My Top Ten Favorite Technical Writing Tools

by Ivan Walsh on April 25, 2010

I’ll be honest. I love Microsoft Word! Adobe FrameMaker has it’s moment but, y’know, it’s can be so lame that it beggar’s belief. I’ve used the same technical writing tools for the last 5 years. A few products have come across my desk but nothing that really blown me away. Here’s a run-down of what I use to write my technical documents. No order of preference. Which should I keep? Which should I replace?

Technical  Communication Software Tools

Microsoft Word

90% of my technical writing is in Microsoft Word. Like it or not, this is the most popular technical writing tool on the planet. Adobe FrameMaker might get the kudos but MS Word is what most all engineers, testers, and other contributors use to write their document. This is the one technical writing tool that I can’t live without. Could you?

Adobe FrameMaker

Perfect for so-called ‘long documents’. I’ve used Adobe FrameMaker for years before it finally crashed and that was my laptop’s fault. It’s hard to beat on stability BUT the user interface is a dog. Adobe FrameMaker is ideal for complex ‘books’ with graphs, tables, and diagrams. Unlike Word, it retains the settings and the master templates are a joy.

The problem with FrameMaker is…

It’s so hard (for me) to customize. I wish importing/exporting documents, even to PDF, can be problematic. You would think Adobe would have ironed out these areas buy now…

Camtasia

I use Camtasia for creating movies, tutorials and screen recordings. Techsmith products are a delight and this is no exception. It lets me make movies, for example, of an application, add sound, annotations and then export it to HTML or Flash. Arguably my fav tool. Wish I had more reasons to use it!

Snagit

There are other cheaper and free screenshots tools out there Snagit this is the only one I use to taking screen grabs/screenshots. The price is not that much considering how much you get back in return. Also, the folks at Techsmith are very helpful.

What’s so special?

I like the way I can take screenshots with one click (you can add it to the web browser) and then crop, edit and modify the image in the editor. Other features let you batch edit the images, for example, add your website address or add a nice border to all images.

Adobe Photoshop

I started in DTP after college so this always has a soft spot with me. Actually, doing the graphics is a nice counter-balance to writing activities. I’ve also found the documents which look nice graphically are more appreciated than plainer ‘image-free’ documents.

Visio

The only tool I’ve used for process mapping and diagramming. Smartdraw is better priced but I know this inside out and can get large diagrams into Microsoft Word (edit, paste special) quickly without destroying the document in the process.

Learning how to create process maps (correctly) was what showed me how this works. Not the most intuitive of apps but wonderful when you get into it.

Epic Editor

My most recent exposure to DITA and structured authoring was with this tool. It’s very unforgiving (unlike Word for example) but once you get the hang of it, you’ll really see its strengths. Expensive but worth the investment if you need a heavy-weight tech authoring tool. Ideal for creating content ‘chunks’, DITA maps and task type information.

Notepad++

Wordpad is fine and I also have also used UltraEdit. Actually, UltraEdit was the best tool I used but it became a commercial tool somewhere along the way (or I kept getting nagware ads) so I gave up and moved to NotePad++. I like the way it re-opens your last tabs (i.e. files) so you can hit the ground running. The Line Counter is also a nice touch.

RoboHelp

For creating help files and online documentation… well, I want to say that it’s Doc-to-Help as this is what I started with in London all those years back.

Sadly, Doc-to-Help seems to have lost market share and RoboHelp has went from strength to strength. Once Adobe bought it, it ploughed tons of resources into it, aligned it (somewhat) with Adobe FrameMaker and it’s now the defacto tool for HAT. Or is it? Flare?

XML Spy

We all get dragged into XML at some point. This tool has a nice UI that shows the tree structure of the tags and how they inter-relate. For someone with zero XML knowledge, This helped me get my teeth the code, create the docs, and get out without mangling the application.

Honorable mentions

  • Adobe Acrobat
  • Doc-to-Help
  • InDesign (replacement for PageMaker)
  • MadCap Flare
  • SmartDraw
  • Turbodemo (for creating screen recordings and tutorials)
  • WhiteSmoke (more for writing business English documents)

So, what tech writing tools you use?

Which of these tools do you think I should ditch? Is there a better tool that Adobe FrameMaker for creating mammoth documents? Or, should I drop Visio and use something open source?

Let me know what you think.

Related posts:

  1. What are Your Favorite 10 Technical Writing Tools?
  2. Audience Analysis: Power Tools for Technical Writing
  3. Technical Writing News – Nov 27th
  4. How to Setup a Technical Writing Department
  5. Technical Writing News – FrameMaker Shortcuts, Life-Saving Checklists & Twitter for Professional Development
  • Yaakov Simon

    I really like Author-It, but it is primarily useful in specific situations. It has a great GUI and is very stable.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Hi Yaakov
    It’s one of those tools I've always wanted to use but the client never had onsite. I actually started with ForeHelp all those years ago, if you remember it, which was also quite good. Seems to be gone now.

  • http://kaiweber.wordpress.com/ Kai

    I'd call Word an okay word processor, but because it's document-based, it's really obnoxious to use for topic-based writing. I've yet to see a working example of several documents reuse/share the same topics seamlessly and easily. Same with any online deliverables except for PDF. Word to HTML or CHM is a nightmare, in my experience.

    For a topic-based HAT, I prefer Flare (though I've never worked with RoboHelp). I especially appreciate that all topics and all settings are open XHTML. So if the (usually reliable) interface won't let me do what I need, I can always tweak the code.

    For an ASCII text editor, I actually prefer PlainEdit, since I don’t do much coding. For plain text wrangling, it can’t be beat. You can convert text in more ways than I ever had use for, between special characters and HTML, between ANSI, ASCII and UTF-8. You can remove trailing spaces and lines containing certain characters. You can sort all lines from A to Z or inversely. And it can search and replace regular expressions. I'd recommend Notepad++, iIf you are coding and want syntax support for programming languages.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    What tool do you use for word-processing? I've looked at others, like Open Office, and not seen enough to make the switch.
    Notepad++ is terrific. Love the advanced cut/paste functions.
    Flare is v good and not that different that RoboHelp, unless it’s changed in the last few releases. Havent upgraded in a while.
    Will download PlainEdit now. Sounds impressive.

  • http://kaiweber.wordpress.com/ Kai

    Oh, I DO use Word for word processing – and more. I just wouldn't put it on a list of favorite tools of mine… ;-)

  • tjrainey

    MadCap Flare has replaced many combinations of Word/Frame/Webworks/Robohelp for me. Does everything I need for the PDF and varying help outputs I need to produce.
    Word was just way too unreliable time and again. Frame was stable, but like you said, had an ugly interface.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Adobe FrameMaker could have been the killer app if Adobe put the funds into it. I think they have went with InDesign instead.

  • Craig

    I agree with you about Word, but my new home computer is a rebuilt second-hand Windows XP — that doesn't have MS Office. I don't have Word, but I need it.

    Like everyone else, I'm following a strict budget these days. Where can I find a reasonably priced copy of MS Office 2003 to download?

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Why not ‘go rogue’ and try Open Office?
    I tried to use Google Docs last year but gave up as there was no import option.

  • Craig

    That's what I'm using now. Problem is, even though I can prep docs to be opened by other apps, such as Word, the members of my Writers Group seem to have problems opening the exports of writing samples I sent out. Hence, my search for an inexpensive copy of Word.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Buy and Sell magazine was the best way to get software when I was in Europe. Do they have something like that where you are? Kind of like offline ebay.

  • BillKerschbaum

    Hi, Ivan. Nice list. I've recently been using Camtasia and I'm enjoying it quite a bit. I'd like to see a couple features, but it's easy to use and it produces a nice looking video. Also like Visio quite a bit – it makes flow charting a lot of fun.

    Gotta take exception on RoboHelp, though. RH may have the lion's share of the market, but I wouldn't list it as a favorite application. All I do is struggle with it to do basic tasks (import decent-looking images, create a TOC, etc.). Plus, their user/tech support is horrible!

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Hey Bill,
    I upgraded to Camtasia 6 and, after a few hitches, found ways to make my movies that little bit quicker and better (I hope).
    One is that it allows you to import .mov files in – rather than convert – and work on it directly.
    The other is that I now have better control of the timeline. It also seems to compress the videos much faster. The YouTube presets also help.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Re: Robohelp. Yep, I've found Adobe very unhelpful to deal with. Lousy attitude.

    Techsmith & ComponentOne are much more helpful.

  • oytuntez

    There is a tool for translation. It's called TRADOS and there are many examples on this type softwares. It makes it easier to translate technical writings like manuals, as it reminds you what you had written before as a correspondance to an alike sentence.

    Is there a tool like this for technical writing? To remind me the structure of similar sentences, so that we can be more adequate in our form and style?

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    I don’t know, to be honest.
    I have some friends who translate technical documents, mostly for Japan. I'll ask them and see if they use any specialized tools.

  • oytuntez

    Thank you.
    But i already have proper tools for translation. I'd like to know if there is any tool for technical writing, e.g. to remind me a similar sentence that i wrote before on the same document…

    I would appreciate it.

  • http://www.wordtipsandtricks.com/2010/05/27/kate-winslet%e2%80%99s-7-ways-to-checking-technical-documents/ Kate Winslet’s 7 Ways to Checking Technical Documents | Microsoft Word Tips & Tricks

    [...] – Technical Writing involves writing multiple drafts. This means that after each draft, you need to check that the edits have been included in the [...]

  • http://www.writestarr.com/ Mike Starr

    I'm definitely with you on Microsoft Word; it's been my primary tool for technical communication for a number of years now. I've used FrameMaker and you're right… the UI is really clunky. I love the way I can customize the bejeezus out of Microsoft Word.

    I, too, started help authoring with ForeHelp; it was a really good tool and at the time, I felt it beat the snot out of RoboHelp but they just never invested enough in marketing to prevent their market share from dwindling to the point where they ended up going out of business.

    I've been using Paint Shop Pro for editing images and never felt SnagIt added any value (for me) with respect to screen captures. My typical process is {Alt} + {PrntScreen} then paste into Paint Shop Pro, If I need to, I can record macros in Paint Shop Pro to handle repetitive image manipulation. It's pretty much as powerful as PhotoShop but a lot cheaper.

  • http://www.ivanwalsh.com Ivan Walsh

    Hey Mike,
    Forehelp was a great little tool. Real shame that they dropped the ball. RoboHelp is fine but it costs so much and many smaller end customers can’t afford it.
    PSP was my weapon of choice when I did web design years back. It’s got all the nice little touches. I use Snagit mostly out of habit and don’t have the time/drive to learn another s/shot product.
    We used a free open source tool at IBM for s/shots that was great. Got it on Sourceforge. Forget the name…
    Re: Word, I think it’s fine. I've written 200 page documents that worked for everyone, e.g. review, publishing etc.
    Adobe FrameMaker locks everyone bar the technical writer out of the equation. I guess that makes sense if you want to protect your turf, so to speak, but otherwise Word’s fine.
    Take care,
    Ivan

  • http://www.ihearttechnicalwriting.com/user-guides/kate-winslets-7-secret-ways-to-revise-technical-documents/4510/ Kate Winslet’s 7 Secret Ways to Revise Technical Documents | I Heart Technical Writing, Tips, Tools and Templates for Technical Writers

    [...] – Technical Writing involves writing multiple drafts. This means that after each draft, you need to check that the edits have been included in the [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: